Methodology
How the R2 Framework and R2G Standard are calculated.
Overview.
The R2 Framework and R2G Standard combine two data pipelines — primary survey research and AI-discoverable digital signals — into a single calibrated composite. Neither source alone is sufficient. Their combination is what makes the R2G Standard defensible.
Primary survey research.
The R2 Framework's survey component captures how the company is perceived, trusted, and prioritized across five primary stakeholder audiences:
- Policy and regulators
- Financial community (investors, analysts, financial press)
- Talent market (current employees, prospective employees, alumni)
- Journalists and media
- Customers and users
Survey instruments are calibrated to the two foundations and seven levers of the R2 Framework and administered across statistically significant sample sizes per audience per market. Data is refreshed quarterly.
AI-discoverable digital signals.
The R2 Framework's digital component measures how the company appears across the AI-generated answer environments that increasingly precede audience encounters with the brand.
Signals are collected across:
- ChatGPT (approximately 80–85% weight in the composite)
- Google AI Overviews and Gemini (approximately 10–15% weight)
- Perplexity, Claude, Grok, and other emerging environments (remainder, distributed)
For each model, R2 measures across a rotating panel of category-relevant queries: brand-name queries, category queries, product queries, executive queries, competitor comparison queries, and crisis-topic queries.
Digital signals are refreshed continuously. Composite digital scores are recalculated weekly.
Calibration between survey and digital.
The R2 Framework treats primary survey research and AI-discoverable digital signals as independent measurements of the same underlying reputation and relevance quantities. Divergence between the two is diagnostic — not error. When a company's survey-measured reputation exceeds its AI-visible reputation, the gap indicates communication opportunity. When AI-visible reputation exceeds survey reputation, the gap indicates over-reliance on discoverability without underlying stakeholder conviction.
The R2G Standard composite score is calibrated to weight the two pipelines equally, adjusted quarterly based on category and market maturity.
Model weighting.
The R2 Framework publishes its model weighting quarterly, versioned and archived. The current weighting (Q3 2026) is:
- ChatGPT
- 82%
- Google AI Overviews and Gemini
- 12%
- Perplexity
- 3%
- Claude, Grok, and others
- 3%
Weighting is recalibrated based on measured audience use across primary stakeholder categories. All historical weightings are archived and available on request.
The stakeholder lens.
The R2G Standard produces a single composite number. That number, alone, is not the deliverable. R2 interprets the number through five stakeholder lenses — each of which reads the same underlying data through a different set of concerns.
- Policy and regulators read the score for institutional legitimacy, transparency, and regulatory alignment.
- Financial community reads it for durability of growth, valuation defensibility, and disclosure quality.
- Talent market reads it for employer brand strength, leadership credibility, and mission clarity.
- Journalists and media read it for narrative coherence, controversy exposure, and story availability.
- Customers and users read it for product credibility, category authority, and reputational risk.
Each lens produces a red/yellow/green diagnostic across the two foundations and seven levers, plus a named-move recommendation set.
Diagnose · Direct · Do™
R2 engagements are structured in three tiers:
- 01Diagnose — the R2G Standard score, two-foundation, seven-lever breakdown, AI-visibility summary, and stakeholder lens maps.
- 02Direct — content gap analysis, page-priority guidance, messaging framework by stakeholder, and paid/earned/owned allocation.
- 03Do — schema and JSON-LD structured data generation, syndication recommendations, and content briefs.
R2 does not offer automated content generation or click-the-button reputation remediation. Reputation is earned through decisions and actions, not through automated content overrides. R2's remediation stops where the company's decision-making begins.
Versioning and transparency.
The R2 Framework methodology is versioned. Every material change to the framework, the equation, or the model weighting is published, dated, and preserved in an archived version history. The current published version is 1.0 (July 2026).
The R2G Standard is a proprietary composite methodology of Objektive Ventures. Full technical documentation is available under license to R2 subscribers.